Content Plan Analysis & Feedback

The plan is excellent. It covers informational and calculational intent, optimizes for high-value keywords, provides necessary E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness) elements, and uses the calculator’s image input fields to structure the measurement guides.

Strengths

• Strong SEO Foundation: The plan hits all major SEO points: optimized title/meta descriptions, keyword density targets, schema markup (FAQPage + Calculator), internal/outbound links, and a competitive word count goal (2,800–3,200 words).
• Comprehensive Coverage: It addresses the primary keywords (“body fat calculator,” “calculate body fat at home”) and crucial niche/military-focused terms (“Army body fat composition calculator 2024,” “Navy body fat”).
• E-E-A-T Focus: The inclusion of an Expert Review & Disclaimer and a clear checklist for citing sources (CDC, DoD, ACSM) ensures the content will be viewed as trustworthy and authoritative, which is critical for health-related topics.
• Calculational Integration: Sections 3, 4, and 6 directly relate to the calculator’s function and the methods behind it, fulfilling the user’s primary “calculational” intent.

Refinements & Suggestions

1. Integrating the Calculator Image

The provided image shows the U.S. Navy Method inputs for a male (Gender, Weight, Height, Neck Circumference, Waist Circumference).

• Action: In Section 3 (How to Calculate Body Fat), specifically when explaining the U.S. Navy Method, explicitly mention that the calculator uses these specific measurements (Weight (kg), Height (cm), Neck Circumference (cm), Waist Circumference (cm)) as the primary required fields. This ties the on-page content directly to the tool itself.

2. Refining the Military Section

Section 6 is critical for the target audience of military applicants.

• Refinement: Rename or re-focus the “Army Body Fat Composition Calculator (2024 update)” to include the Tape Test and Circumference-Based Measurement keywords. The military does not typically use the Navy’s or a standard online calculator’s formula; they use a specific circumference-based tape test (measuring neck and abdomen/waist, sometimes hip).
  • Suggestion: Change the subsection to “The Military Tape Test Explained (Army, Navy, USMC)” to cover the core method used for compliance across services.

3. Addressing the BMI Integration

Section 2 and Section 3 mention BMI.

• Refinement: Ensure the BMI-Based Estimation (Section 3) is given enough detail to be useful but is clearly positioned as the least accurate method, reinforcing the core message of Section 2 (“Why body fat % is a better measure of health”). This creates a strong contrast and highlights the value of the main calculator tool.

4. Enhancing Keyword Cluster in Section 7

Section 7 (Most Accurate Body Fat Calculator) should fully capitalize on the high-intent comparison keywords.